Ann Coulter Blows It Again

You know that I try to restrain myself when it comes to writing about Ann Coulter. I really do. I know you don't believe me, but I really, really do.

But then she writes something so egregiously ignorant and just plain stupid that I can't help myself.

Here is just part of her latest column, on Mike Huckabee:

[Huckabee] responded to my column last week -- pointing out that he is on record supporting the Supreme Court's sodomy-is-a-constitutional-right decision -- by saying that he was relying on the word of a caller to his radio show and didn't know the details of the case. Ironically, that's how most people feel about sodomy: They support it until they hear the details.

First, I'd pay a lot of money to hear how a court opinion finding that sodomy is a constitutional right could be made to sound reasonable. But the caller had the right response when Huckabee asked him, "What's your favorite radio station?" So he seemed like a reliable source.

Second, Huckabee's statement that he agreed with the court's sodomy ruling was made one week after the decision. According to Nexis, in that one week, the sodomy decision had been the cover story on every newspaper in the country, including The New York Times. It was the talk of all the Sunday news programs. It had been denounced by every conservative and Christian group in America -- as well as other random groups of sane individuals having no conservative inclinations whatsoever.

The highest court in the land had found sodomy was a constitutional right! That sort of thing tends to make news. (I was going to say the sodomy ruling got publicity up the wazoo, but this is, after all, Christmas week.)

So this little stretch-marked cornpone is either lying, has a closed head injury, is a complete ignoramus -- or all of the above.

Okay. I know you're dying to find out -- what's the dog that didn't bark this time? Besides Coulter herself, that is (oh, wait a minute -- that dog does bark).

It's not the fact that Coulter calling Huckabee "stretch-marked" is almost certainly a case of the pot calling the kettle black. That would be too easy. Way too easy. It's better than that.

It's not even the fact that Coulter is disparaging sodomy when she herself is a notorious fag-hag. That's not it either.

Are you ready?

Coulter doesn't know the meaning of the word "sodomy."

She can't. You know how I can tell? Because if she did know the meaning of the word, she wouldn't be so disparaging towards the idea of sodomy since she has almost certainly practiced it herself.

Coulter has the erroneous belief, shared by many ignorant people, that sodomy pertains solely to anal intercourse. It does not, as anyone who owns a dictionary can attest. It pertains to any and all sexual contact that is not heterosexual intercourse, including any and all oral/genital contact.

Its nice to know that Coulter knows as much about the definition of sodomy as she does about Darwin -- that is, absolutely nothing.

But that doesn't keep her from shooting her mouth off. So to speak.

Tom Moran