What Should Have Won, Part I: The 1930s
Since the Academy Awards are this month, I thought I would spend February hosting a little experiment.
What kind of experiment, do you ask?
Well, pretty much everyone knows that the Motion Picture Academy almost always chooses the wrong film to win the Best Picture Oscar. You can probably think of about a dozen examples at random. So what I thought I would do is spend this month going through the Oscars decade by decade (starting in 1934, the first year that the Oscars were given out for films made in a single year) and choose what I think should have won the Academy Award for Best Picture that year.
First the rules: in order to win Best Picture the film has to have been nominated for an Oscar that year in at least one category (not necessarily Best Picture). Ironically, some classic films were not nominated for a single Academy Award: City Lights, Modern Times, A Face in the Crowd, Touch of Evil and Mean Streets leap to mind.
Also, to simplify things, I’m not going to consider foreign films. Only American-made films qualify for an Oscar.
Have we got the rules straight? Good.
We’ll start off with the 1930s:
1934
What film won Best Picture: It Happened One Night
What film should have won: The Gay Divorcee
Frank Capra’s film won Best Picture and Capra won the first of three best Director Oscars (and in a five-year period, something no other director has equaled) for his prototypical screwball comedy, It Happened One Night. But if I had been around and voting, I think I would have given the Oscar to the Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers musical The Gay Divorcee. Musicals almost never win Best Picture (and when they do, it’s usually the wrong ones), but you have to think that Academy voters might have been swayed by the fact that Capra had utterly humiliated himself the year before by rushing up to the stage when presenter Will Rogers yelled out, “Come and get it, Frank!” only to realize when he was halfway to the stage that he meant Frank Lloyd, the director of the now-unwatchable Cavalcade. Ironically, Astaire-Rogers musicals made in the following two years are arguably better than The Gay Divorcee, but it’s all about timing. I might have been persuaded to give it to The Thin Man, had the filmmakers only cut the first ten minutes from the film and opened the story where the book opens, with the speakeasy scene. Those ten wretched minutes, in my opinion, cost them an Oscar.
1935
What film won Best Picture: Mutiny on the Bounty
What film should have won: Mutiny on the Bounty
This is one of the few times that the Academy got it right. Frank Lloyd’s seafaring epic, with two great performances by Clark Gable and Charles Laughton, was the clear first choice. Out of the dozen films nominated for Best Picture (and some of them are great films, such as Top Hat, Captain Blood and David O. Selznick’s adaptation of David Copperfield), this is the one I would most want to see again. By the way, I think the Academy should go back to the idea of having a dozen films nominated for Best Picture.
1936
What film won Best Picture: The Great Ziegfeld
What film should have won: Fury
Once again Selznick had an adaptation of a Dickens classic up for Best Picture (this time it was A Tale of Two Cities), and other Best Picture nominees included Libeled Lady, San Francisco and Romeo and Juliet. And while I’m tempted to go with several films, including Swing Time and Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, I think I would opt for Fritz Lang’s Fury – one of the most atypically savage films ever to be released by MGM. A harrowing tale of a man falsely accused and almost lynched for a crime he didn’t commit, it has a shattering performance by Spencer Tracy as a man who’s lost everything except the desire for vengeance. Tracy was nominated that year, but not for Fury – his relatively benign Catholic priest in San Francisco earned him a nomination, but not the Oscar. Not that year, anyway. Ironically, a film I would have seriously considered for Best Picture (Charlie Chaplin’s Modern Times) wasn’t even nominated for a single Oscar. I guess the Academy didn’t want to take a chance on silent pictures coming back.
1937
What film won Best Picture: The Life of Emile Zola
What film should have won: The Awful Truth
I’ll tell you a guilty secret: I’m a big fan of Warner Bros. biopics of the 1930s and 40s. Seriously – you put me in front of a TV set and put on Dispatch from Reuters and I’m in heaven. And Paul Muni hamming it up under a big bushy beard as the great French naturalist novelist is just magnificent. So why am I choosing The Awful Truth over The Life of Emile Zola? I know the Academy likes to choose Big Important Films on Big Important Topics to win Best Picture, but the fact is that sometimes it’s the smaller films that wear better, and The Awful Truth is a joy to behold. It’s the kind of sophisticated romantic comedy that they just don’t make anymore – maybe they took this kind of film for granted at the time, but they don’t make them like this anymore.
1938
What film won Best Picture: You Can’t Take It With You
What film should have won: The Adventures of Robin Hood
Capra won his second Best Picture Oscar for his adaptation of the Kaufman and Hart comedy about a house full of misfits who live the way they want to live, but the clear first choice (barring Renoir’s Grand Illusion, which received an unusual Best Picture nomination for a foreign language film) was the magnificent The Adventures of Robin Hood, with Errol Flynn as the prince of thieves cutting a colorful swath through Sherwood Forest. Great action, superb sword fighting (you can’t beat Flynn and Basil Rathbone in a sword fight) arguably the best score in the history of Hollywood (by Erich Wolfgang Korngold) and three-strip Technicolor used as it’s never been used before or since. It’s one of the most entertaining films ever, and it should have won.
1939
What film won Best Picture: Gone With the Wind
What film should have won: Gone With the Wind
1939 is universally regarded as the greatest year in the history of Hollywood, and when you look at the films nominated for Oscars that year you have to agree. The list of films released that year is dazzling – there had to have been at least half a dozen films that in any other year would have deserved to win Best Picture. But this is one of those years when the conventional wisdom was right – Gone With the Wind was the culmination of 30s filmmaking, and deserved all the Oscars it won.
In a few days I’ll take on the films from the 1940s.
Tom Moran
2 Comments:
Speaking of Modern Times, I met online a relative (probably second cousin-once removed or something) of Paulette Goddard, who tells me that Ms. Goddard and her co-star Mr. Chaplin never actually married. I suppose the brief stay in Mexico in 1942 was a ruse too.
I've really been enjoying your posts on the past Oscars. I wanted to offer up a few comments for each decade(I'll stick with your rule of only choosing films that were nominated in some capacity that year)...
The 30s is such a hard decade to decide what should have won because our "favorites" of today were often unnoticed program pictures in their own time.
Interestingly, I think 1934 was one year the Academy got it absolutely right. I still find IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT to be a delightful comedy and great film.
1935-Although it's a tough choice, I would have to go with THE INFORMER for this year.
1936-I would have voted for MR. DEEDS GOES TO TOWN in this year. One of Capra's more light-hearted efforts, with a great Gary Cooper performance.
1937-With so much to choose from, I would have to end up going with THE AWFUL TRUTH-hugely influential in the romantic/screwball comedy tradition, and most importantly, it really stands the test of time.
1938-As hard as it is to ignore the two foreign films miraculously nominated this year (GRAND ILLUSION and PYGMALION), I will go with ANGELS WITH DIRTY FACES-excellent later Warners gangster film with a great Cagney performance. This is a really tough year-for me, there's no one clear choice that jumps out at me (barring the two foreign films, of course), and the Capra film that did win this year (YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU) isn't even one of my favorite of his films.
1939-It's hard to imagine anything other than GONE WITH THE WIND winning, but if I had to select something else, I might just go with MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON for tackling very well what must have been material far ahead of its time (at its most frantic, it's as darkly satirical and revealing as, say, NETWORK was in 1976).
I'll comment on your 1940s post next (have you considered posting these lists to rec.arts.movies.past-films? That could make for some interesting feedback).
Post a Comment
<< Home